Sunday, May 29, 2011

Under the same Moon


This immigration film follows a nine-year-old Mexican boy as he travels from his native country to the United States in search of his mother who lives in Los Angeles. The young boy’s journey features many improbable events, from his being smuggled across the border by two young college students who have decided to become coyotes in order to earn college tuition to his working picking tomatoes and washing dishes, all of which takes place in a single week.

While the story is distinctly episodic, as is often the case with a quest or travel narrative, most of the adventures work. The film nicely straddles the line between informing the viewer of the various experiences of an immigrant and the more sentimentalized narrative of a young boy. While the film clearly aims to show immigrant experience, it moves in and around the clichés frequently touching on the expected elements in unexpected ways.

The film follows many of the conventions of sentimental films particularly in the love plot that that is centered on the mother. The combination of the improbable elements of the boys journey in the standard elements of the films emotional tropes, works surprisingly well to balance the film and keep it from being either pedantic or treacly.  Perhaps one of the most remarkable features of the film is the dialogue is almost entirely in Spanish. 
This grounds the story in the realm of immigrant experience.

Which isn't to say everything works. The plot has numerous defects that are obvious enough to distract from the content of the film. And the direction and technical elements are rather unsteady. Some of the shots that are attempted distract rather than complement or enhance the action. 

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Rio Bravo (1959)



Wonderful film with a view of humanity that is complete crap: don’t ask for help, even when you need it; don’t say you love someone, even when you do.  If you just act tough, everything will work out in the end.  What bullshit!  

The characters are caricatures; reducible to the nicknames each is given.  But they are deep caricatures, having only one note but a note that reverberates deeply like the sound of a gong being struck.   

John Wayne imposes him masculinity on the screen; truly remarkable the way he dominates everything around him, even at 50+ years old. 

Bean: The Movie (1997)



Very, very bad.  Mr. Bean is amusing in small doses but stretching the concept for ninety minutes was almost certain to be unsustainable.  Still one would have hoped the movie included a few clever moments.  They aren’t here though.  Some of the gags are even recycled from British TV show version but the filmmakers didn’t even pick the best ones.  The plot is slender and the final act is added to the film to stretch the time out even though the issues of the main plot have already been resolved. 

Sunday, May 08, 2011

Hanna (2011)



A nice action flick whose plot closely follows The Bourne Identity, with a teenage girl killing machine fighting against corrupt elements of the CIA who are responsible for creating her.   Great movie? Certainly not.  Hanna teases some larger ideas of coming of age, fairytales, family, violence but these just add a rich background to the film.  This film has nothing great to say and one will not learn anything from watching it (except perhaps about filmmaking).  Are there holes in the plot? Sure.  Plenty.  Is the formula of precocious young girl as a killer a little bit of a tired? Certainly it has been done before.  Yet against these weaknesses the filmmakers’ considerable craft distinguishes Hanna from the standard summer action flick.

The pacing perhaps best shows the difference between a filmmaker like Wright and a hack like Michael Bay.  The only time a Bay movie slows down is for poorly phrased exposition or weak character development.  Then it’s on to the action.  In films like Transformers and the like, such scenes seem obligatory parts that are forced into the action.  Wright knows how and when to let a scene play out.  One example finds Hanna on a date with an older boy as they watch a flamenco group perform around a campfire.   It works because the music is powerful, the human voice contrasts with the film’s electronic score (excellently done by the Chemical Brothers), the scene plays on Hanna’s never having heard music, which frankly could have been a bit much (a girl who has never seen the world adapts so quickly to all these new experiences?).  But the scene isn’t forced and Hanna’s wonder at hearing music isn’t overplayed; Wright just shoots the singing and dancing, with only a couple of quick reaction shots during the two or so minutes. It certainly isn’t the type of pause in the action that a studio would allow in a tent pole summer film.  

The camera work is excellent throughout.  Including at least one remarkable tracking shot seems to be a hallmark of Wright’s.  The Atonement tracking shot was technically amazing and has been much praised but also critiqued for being unnecessary and indulgent.  Hanna includes another technically excellent tracking shot, although not at the level of complexity as the one from Atonement.  Hanna’s tracking shot follows the father as he walks out of an airport, continues down the street, realizes he is being followed, goes down an escalator into the subway, and then in the station kicks the shit out of three men.   Much like this film, the shot won’t be long remembered because it has no larger significance.  It is a bit of craft that functions well in film and provides a contrast to the rapid cuts in other scenes. 

Saoirse Ronan is excellent and plays the teenager as killer role to the full.  Eric Bana is perfectly fine as the dad.  Cate Blanchett’s evil CIA operative is the weakest character in the film.  Blanchett plays individual scenes well but her character’s motivations and developed rather unevenly. 

The plotting has major logical weaknesses but the screenplay gets a couple of key things right.  First, the film is willing to kill off the father.  No forced happy endings here.  Second, the ending and particularly the final line of dialogue directly refer back to the opening scene but the connection is forced.  Wright doesn’t linger on it which helps avoid making the bookend quote feel forced.  The link between the quotes also serves a purpose.  In the third act, the film shows Hanna perhaps having a revelation and giving up violence.  The film toys with taking that sentimental path but the end show that Hanna is what she has been made to be.  At the end of the film Hanna is who she was at the beginning of the film, a trained killer.